CC™ VideoSpective
Wednesday
Monday
Political Sign Vandalism (Part 2) - Federal Way, Washington State Mayoral Race
CC™ VideoSpective
According to RCW 29a.84.040, each instance of defacement or removal is a separate violation. Misdemeanors can be punishable by up to 90 days in jail or a fine of up to $1,000, or both.
Sunday
Political Sign Vandalism - Federal Way, Washington State Mayoral Race
CC™ VideoSpective
This video (there will be a second part to it) was actually the second incident in a spate of 24 hours of political vandalism against our Mayoral campaign in the City of Federal Way.
The first incident occurred on July 4th, 2025 at the intersection of Celebration Park road and 13th Pl S.
Regarding the first incident, I Spoke with officers Boyle and Rodriguez of the FWPD about our sign being taken down on 7/4/25 around 7:45pm PST at the Celebration Park Intersection on Celebration Park Rd.
While we have documented that first incident accordingly, the second incident is even more brazen, as this video and the subsequent one will show. We will take the necessary steps to tackle these obvious acts of intimidation head-on, and we will be directed and aggressive in ensuring that the full extent of the law is brought to bare on the responsible parties.
According to RCW 29a.84.040, each instance of defacement or removal is a separate violation. Misdemeanors can be punishable by up to 90 days in jail or a fine of up to $1,000, or both.
Saturday
Friday
Thursday
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday
Thursday
British Royal family refused to employ people from racial and ethnic minorities
 |
| WPA POOL/GETTY IMAGES |
To this day it is impossible for women or people of ethnic minorities to seek legal action due to discrimination they have faced working for the royal household.
Buckingham Palace had banned the appointment of "colored immigrants or foreigners" from serving in clerical roles in the royal household until at least the late 1960s, according to newly discovered documents from the National Archives.
The documents were obtained by The Guardian as part of their ongoing investigation into how the royal family have used an outdated procedure known as the Queen's Consent in order to influence British law.
The documents reveal that although immigrants and people of ethnic minorities were permitted to work in the royal family's staff as domestic servants, in 1968 the Queen's chief financial manager said that "it was not, in fact, the practice to appoint colored immigrants or foreigners" to cleric roles in the royal household.
The documents do not indicate when this practice ended, and royal household records only indicate the racial and ethnic background of staff from the 1990s onwards, making it impossible to know when they repealed this rule.
Buckingham Palace refused to answer questions about the ban and when it had officially been repealed when questioned on the matter by The Guardian.
Due to the Queen's Consent procedure, the Queen is personally exempt from following equality laws which were put into place in the 1970. To this day the exemption makes it impossible for women or people of ethnic minorities to seek legal action due to discrimination they have faced working for the royal household.
The royal family has been under scrutiny for racism and discrimination in recent years due to an interview with Oprah in which Meghan Markle revealed that she had struggled with her mental health during her time in the royal family, and alleged that when she was pregnant with her son Archie, an unnamed member of the royal family had expressed worry about the color of her unborn child's skin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
